Electing vs. Selecting

Deborah Venable

05/10/07

 

With the first two “major debates” out of the way now, the race is on for the 2008 presidential election.  We are definitely off to a more grandiose race for the office than previously witnessed in our history, so it will be interesting to watch it unfold.  Everyone seems to be ready and willing to get his two cents worth in early while closely guarding a final commitment to an actual endorsement of any candidate.  That’s okay.  It’s far too early to endorse anyway. 

 

There is this, though:

 

Without endorsing a specific candidate, the American people should begin to form a commitment in their minds to a platform and policy stances.  I don’t believe that was done in the 2006 mid-term election cycle, and that explains the current confusion within the major political parties about what that election actually signified.  It probably hasn’t been adequately done in elections over the last decade or so.  The resounding cry has too often been, “we must vote for change!”

 

While voting for change can be a legitimate concern, it can be dangerous if we do not properly analyze just what change we are seeking.  Then there is the problem of the individual candidates failing to define their party platform or their policy commitments in their feverish campaigning for individual votes.  Add to that the growing ignorance of the American electorate of their history, their government, or their responsibilities, and you have a recipe for future turmoil and possible disaster.

 

After the presidential election fiasco of 2000, the term “selected, not elected” was applied to President Bush and has continued to haunt his entire presidency.  This happened because of the ignorance I mentioned above and because so many Americans HAD wanted and voted for change only to encounter an almost equal number clinging vehemently to the last change they had voted in eight years earlier.  It happened because a vast bloc of the electorate chose to stay home from the polls, shirk their responsibility, and then proceed to loudly complain about or defend the results from that position of irresponsibility.  It also happened because we cannot trust our own polling system any more and must continually cry foul over such silly things as hanging chads, faulty voting machines, and deliberate voter fraud. 

 

Excusing all this behavior is quite out of the question, including the whining accusations of “selected not elected” that President Bush has had to deal with.  Excusing the ignorance of such an integral part of our process as the Electoral College and the calls for its abolition would be extremely dangerous, but you can watch for more demands to that effect.  Specific voter education would not be necessary if the education system in this country was doing its job properly, but we all know that is not happening.  There are NO excuses for the illiteracy and laziness we see in our own electorate.

 

We must not turn a blind eye to legitimate complaints of voter fraud or faulty voting machines  - especially in this high tech environment of so-called efficiency.  Voting in this country must return to the sacred place of honor it once enjoyed, and not be spurned as a useless, meaningless activity that most people can’t be bothered with.  The few cannot continue to carry the many through the trenches of running this self-governing republic without it getting shot up into a real democracy doomed to fail.

 

Voting responsibly necessitates that we all examine our philosophies, our values, and accurately determine just what we expect from our government, and then vote accordingly.  If there are no ideal individual candidates on the ballot, we must vote for the candidate that represents the best outcome.  We can all do that.  What we should never do is cast a vote to punish a particular party for not providing an ideal candidate.  Cutting off your nose to spite your face is not an option for a responsible electorate. 

 

Believe it or not, this is a very controversial stance in modern politics.  It is also known as voting for the lesser of the evils.  I’ve had people tell me that they will always refuse to vote for “evil” – lesser or otherwise.  What they cannot see is that by refusing to vote at all, they are SELECTING not ELECTING evil anyway. 

 

As we begin to gather facts and make our own determinations about the candidates for the next election, let us also learn all we can about the historic importance of the Electoral College and keep in mind the effects of the Seventeenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution on the Senate process.  Let us keep in mind the importance of the Tenth Amendment and the task of the electorate to protect individual AND states’ rights.  Find out how the candidates you intend to support feel about these very important issues.  Determine the extent of your knowledge about the vast difference between a democracy and a republic, and then ask yourself if “change” is what you really want to such things that will continue to exchange our republic for a democracy. 

 

These are perhaps the most important issues that will not be highlighted by many if any of the candidates unless we demand their attention to them.  These are the issues that may very well separate the men from the boys, (sorry Hillary), and the wise from the foolish.     

 

I began this website over five years ago for the specific purpose of addressing an ignorance I saw as the future downfall of America if it was allowed to continue.  The first pages I worked on were the lookup pages for the U.S. Senate, House of Representatives, Supreme Court, and Chief Executives of all 50 states and the White House.  It is a daunting task for a one-person operation to keep those pages as accurate as they are, but I was committed to seeing that information be at anyone’s fingertips without having to search on several sites through more complicated formats. 

 

Enough of the back patting – I would do it all again to help fill a very real educational void.  I know those pages get used on a daily basis, and I even get an occasional thank you for their value. 

 

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, (a little MI lingo there), is to learn all you can, share information, and help to increase awareness of the power of the individual.  We have enough time to make a difference, and we have no excuses for selecting the easy way out by refusing to responsibly elect what we can live with.  

 

 

Home    Rant Page    Comments